<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.mortgageguide101.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Woman Wins In Mortgage Fraud Case</title><link>http://www.mortgageguide101.com/blogs/blog/archive/2007/02/07/106081.aspx</link><description>Susan Lawrence will be keeping her home, and will not be paying off a mortgage to Maple Trust, after the Ontario Court of Appeals reversed its decision on a previous mortgage fraud case, according to an article in the Toronto Star. In fact, the Court</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>re: Woman Wins In Mortgage Fraud Case</title><link>http://www.mortgageguide101.com/blogs/blog/archive/2007/02/07/106081.aspx#107011</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:53:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">afa0456e-4f8f-497f-8a0b-02eabd1b1d28:107011</guid><dc:creator>JF Chalmers</dc:creator><description>For the Court of Appeal to have originally ruled that a homeowner could actually lose their home in the case of title fraud and not place the blame where it really belongs, squarely on the lender who should have verified the proper owner of the home, is absolute idiocy on the part the judges. &amp;nbsp; Any legal precedent that would support such a ridiculous ruling defies logic and actually legitimizes the proceeds of crime. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately it appears this is another case where &amp;quot;legal precedent&amp;quot; has been used, with the complicity of the courts, by special interests at the expense of justice and common moral sense. &amp;nbsp;While correcting the wrong with a more sensible and long overdue ruling that overturned the first ruling, it was too late for the taxpayers of this province. &amp;nbsp;Those judges remain incompetent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Woman Wins In Mortgage Fraud Case</title><link>http://www.mortgageguide101.com/blogs/blog/archive/2007/02/07/106081.aspx#107031</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:33:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">afa0456e-4f8f-497f-8a0b-02eabd1b1d28:107031</guid><dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator><description>When the original decision allowed a fraudulent mortgage to become the responsibility of the homeowner, I was appalled. What the heck was the judge in the first trial thinking? I'd have to agree that this correction of the original wrong was long overdue. </description></item><item><title>re: Woman Wins In Mortgage Fraud Case</title><link>http://www.mortgageguide101.com/blogs/blog/archive/2007/02/07/106081.aspx#116536</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:17:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">afa0456e-4f8f-497f-8a0b-02eabd1b1d28:116536</guid><dc:creator>foolish one</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a massive mortgage fraud on-going in Southern California. Will cause over $1 Billion in damages. I personally lost over $500,000. The perpetrators are James B. Duncan, Andrea Duncan, Hendrix Montecastro, Anthony Contreras, Maurice McLeod, Steve Kayden, Helen Montecastro, Charlie Choi, Paul Sluss, Ross Leonard, John Ranic, Bridgett Holbrook, and Chris Oetting. They operate under many shell companies, Stonewood Consulting, Pacific Wealth Management a NV LLC, Inland Coast Capital, The Henson Group, Success Strategies, Coast Wealth Management, Total Return Fund, Jovane Investments, Cathedral Capital Partners, Palm Valley Advisors, Blushed Boutique, and many many others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beware of them. They have damaged well over 1000 victims and still counting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See our victim website to understand their schemes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.coreclient.110mb.com/"&gt;http://www.coreclient.110mb.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>